![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
Red Portfolio
Preface I've been having a little trouble
lately. You see, my initial problem
is some time ago I lost faith in you.
Don't get me wrong though, it wasn't your fault at all. Many years ago I began to question my belief
system regarding all things spiritual and religious. Along with this forced reflection I began to evaluate the reasons
I grew up with to rationalize my blind faith in such a creature as yourself. I tell you, Lord, my arguments didn't
bode well for you, but again, please, do not take offense or feel hurt
in any way. It isn't that there's
a lack of valid arguments to substantiate believing in you, for there
are countless. The problem is that
for every argument in your favor there's an equally valid argument in
opposition. Since both sides have
valid arguments, I'm forced to stay in the middle and be agnostic. I must admit, however, that I lean towards not
believing in the traditional views of your existence, immortal life after
death, and the nature of suffering in the world. Though you may be happy to know that my conceptions have allowed
for the possibility of a God, I do lean against the traditional views
of such a being. Sorry. As I was writing this letter to
you, God, I decided to fill you in on my recent ideas, since I'm sure
you are interested to know what I have chosen to believe instead of the
traditional views. I took the liberty
of including two of the papers I wrote in my seminar class which best
demonstrate my beliefs. However, before you read them I
should fill you in on their origin. I didn't just churn them out yesterday, you know. Dr. C., my FYS teacher, assigned us three major
papers during the term. The first
paper deals with my beliefs concerning the origin and nature of God. I anticipate that you will find this one interesting
since it deals with you, so I am including it. Also, it presents my beliefs concerning religion.
I must warn you, however, that I chose to stray from the assignment
just a bit. The assignment required us to read
three texts and comment on them and the views presented, or we could go
with the second option. This second
option, the one I chose, asked us to write a religious quest where we
discover and evaluate our own beliefs, possibly using the three texts.
I wasn't completely sure what that meant; I felt it was a little
ambiguous. However, after discussing
the assignment in class, I figured out what I wanted to do.
Later that day I went to my room and began the physical part of
the writing process. I had been thinking about the nature of your
existence for quite some time; therefore, this paper was relatively easy
for me. All I had to do was write
down the thoughts that were already in my head.
That very day I wrote ten pages and later that night went to the
writing center for a consultation. For the next hour or so I discussed
in great detail the whole God issue and religion with one of my friends.
She held a more traditional view (for example, she was certain
you exist). It was a thoroughly
helpful discussion because some of her views are quite the opposite of
mine and a good lively debate ensued. I did not come up with many new ideas but it
was helpful to verbalize what I was trying to say. My brain was in full gear and ready for some stimulating writing.
After I bid farewell to my friend, I waltzed (not literally, it
was more of a foxtrot) back to my room to begin revising. The next day I handed in my paper
and awaited a response. When I
received it back I was a little shocked because I was unaccustomed to
actual feedback; there was a lot of writing on it, but it was purple,
not red. In high school I received either a grade or
a grade with a few nearly useless remarks.
However, on this paper I received a plethora of questions about
what I wrote, places pointed out where I contradicted myself, and hints
letting me know how long-winded I am, something I've been told a lot lately. I took my paper back to my room and a few weeks later
I began revising the paper once again.
I haven't received feedback on the new version but I feel that
I did address a majority of the problems of the initial draft, while adding
three pages. So much for curbing
my tendency of blabbing away! Alas,
I am beginning to believe that there is no longer a chance for me. Anyway, the new version is what I have included for you; I hope you
find it insightful. The third, and last, major paper in my seminar class
dealt with immortality on Earth and life after death. There were definitely some major stylistic changes in order to make
it more formal. Besides the tendency
to ramble on endlessly, my first draft was very informal. It read like I was coming up with the ideas
as I was writing. The reader could
see how my thoughts progressed and could get inside my head a little better. I personally enjoyed how it is written, as it
was very personal, but not everyone felt the same way. In order to make it easier to understand, I
modified the style and this is the version you will be receiving. While writing these three papers, I learned about my
own beliefs and why I believe the way I do, as well as a new appreciation
for the writing process and how beautiful, and difficult, it is. Writing is a ferocious beast to grapple
with, but it makes an interesting mistress of sorts. I have always enjoyed the creative process of
writing but I was always too immature in how I wrote and thought. This term has been my coming-of-age in writing.
During the past four months I have experienced a new thirst for
the written word, in particular creating it myself, as well as a new appreciation
for religion and the art of thought. I don't believe that I have ever put so much of myself
in any paper and enjoyed writing for class as much as I enjoyed the three
papers for my seminar class. I
was used to writing fiction and poems but this was the first time I ever
truly wrote about my beliefs. It
was an exciting experience. I don't
think I'm ready to start writing non-fiction, but I have begun working
on a fictional short story based on events in my life, which is a major
experiment for me. By putting so much of my own thought into these pieces
and by getting useful feedback and the opportunity to revise my papers,
I have improved dramatically in my writing as a whole. I don't believe there is a great difference in the writing style
and ability demonstrated between the three pieces, but I have noticed
a change in the writing I do outside my seminar class.
It is really amazing to see how big the changes are. I know that I'm not yet ready for a professional
writing career, but perhaps I'm on my way to some thought-provoking, world-changing,
gross-amount-of-money-making career in writing, or at least I would like
to imagine so. At any rate, I hope my brief (don't laugh) introduction will help you appreciate what I have written. If, by chance, you choose to strike me down into the deepest depths of Hell because of my "heresy" then I didn't mean any of it. It is all a joke, ha ha. You have a sense of humor, right? Well, anyway, have a great day. Now, where did I put that address? |
||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Return to FYS Portfolio page | ||||||||||||||||||||
This web site created and maintained by the
Coe Writing Center. Copyright 2001. E-mail Dr. Bob Marrs with any questions, comments or suggestions. |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||