![]() |
|
Instructor: Hoover (Spring 2009) Texts (assorted handouts)
Objectives and Content This course is designed for upper level majors and minors in philosophy to give them a chance to engage in in-depth philosophical study of a particular topic much like they would in a graduate level course. The seminar will be structured to allow students to work on individual projects of their choosing, resulting in a polished philosophical paper. The first part of the course will involve an introduction to and interaction with some important examples of philosophical scholarship (fairly recent) in which students will encounter different methods, philosophical styles, as well as opposing philosophical positions. These ‘standards’ of philosophical discourse will come from a variety of topic areas as well. The second part will involve a close reading/discussion of readings that are related to the various topics that students have chosen to examine. Toward the end of the term all students will present their work in a colloquium setting and comment on a classmate's project. The colloquium will provide a chance for each student to respond to comments as well as to questions from a small audience of philosophy faculty and students from Coe. Satisfactory completion of this portion of the course will meet the Philosophy Colloquium requirement for graduating majors. Requirements As an upper level seminar in philosophy, this course is not designed with the intent to simply “download” as much information as possible from instructor to student. Rather, the course will aim at an interactive engagement with the issues, and therefore will depend for its success on the degree of personal involvement on the part of the students. Students will be expected to work through the readings prior to seminar meetings. We will then discuss the prepared material as a group (bringing to class our scintillating comments!! …our puzzling questions!! … our brilliant interpretations!!). Accordingly, students will be expected to attend class religiously and to have prepared the reading for each class (also religiously). A class participation grade will be assigned and will count for 15% of the course grade. Class participation will be graded on the basis of student performance in three areas: attendance; preparation (including discussion questions); and the quality of in-class participation, including any short in-class writing exercises. Proposed Schedule (This schedule is for planning purposes only. The actual day-to-day assignments will be given in-class and posted on the "Daily Assignments" webpage.) Jan. 10 Th Course Introduction Jan. 20 Tu Clifford/James Jan. 22 Tu Jaggar Jan. 27 Th Ryle Jan. 29 Tu Place/Churchland Feb 3 Tu Fodor/Churchland Feb. 5 Th Searle/Churchland Feb. 10 Tu Quine Feb. 12 Th Davidson Feb. 17 Tu Rorty Feb. 19 Th McIntyre Feb. 24 Tu Taylor Feb. 26 Th Foucault March 3 Tu Hacking March 5 Th Zack/Appiah SPRING BREAK March 17 Tu To be decided PROSPECTUS DUE (Mon., March 16) March 19 Th To be decided March 24 Tu Student-led Readings March 26 Th Student-led Readings March 31 Tu Student-led Readings April 2 Th To be decided April 7 Tu No Class April 9 Th No Class LAST DAY TO SUBMIT PAPER (Wed., April 8) April 14 Tu No Class April 16 Th No Class FINAL VERSION DUE (Fri., April 17) April 21 Tu No Class COMMENTS DUE (Wed., April 22) April 23 Th COLLOQUIUM (7:OO PM) April. 28 Tu COLLOQUIUM (7:OO PM) |
|
|
|